From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34478) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qej2c-0000rY-G8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 03:30:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qej2a-0006vM-QK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 03:30:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48224) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qej2a-0006vF-9s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 03:30:28 -0400 Message-ID: <4E15608D.5000201@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 10:30:21 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4E148776.4000805@redhat.com> <4E149B3F.2010709@redhat.com> <4E14BF36.3080803@codemonkey.ws> <6E6E2CFC-B5BB-4E1D-945D-1F13C604330B@suse.de> <4E155CB9.4020009@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4E155CB9.4020009@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] migration: new sections and backward compatibility. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: Juan Quintela , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , jes sorensen , Markus Armbruster , Alexander Graf On 07/07/2011 10:14 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> Can't we just implicitly fail migration whenever there's a device in >> the tree that doesn't have VMSTATE? > > > There are cases where the device doesn't need to save state, so that > alone doesn't cut it. It should then say so by having an empty VMSTATE descriptor. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function