From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50658) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QejBU-0002ys-5k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 03:39:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QejBS-0008Nw-Sm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 03:39:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22991) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QejBS-0008No-Cf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 03:39:38 -0400 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p677dbJV030255 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 03:39:37 -0400 Message-ID: <4E1562B6.9030500@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 09:39:34 +0200 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1309954766-9728-1-git-send-email-alevy@redhat.com> <1309954766-9728-6-git-send-email-alevy@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1309954766-9728-6-git-send-email-alevy@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qxl: move qemu_spice_add_memslot call out of qxl_add_memslot List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alon Levy Cc: yhalperi@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, > -static void qxl_add_memslot(PCIQXLDevice *d, uint32_t slot_id, uint64_t delta) > +static void qxl_add_memslot(PCIQXLDevice *d, uint32_t slot_id, uint64_t delta, > + QXLDevMemSlot *memslot) > - qxl_add_memslot(d, val, 0); > + qxl_add_memslot(d, val, 0,&memslot); > + qemu_spice_add_memslot(&d->ssd,&memslot); Do we still need this and the simliar patches? Given that we don't call qemu_spice_add_memslot() from another thread any more we could just pass in a async flag to qxl_add_memslot(). cheers, Gerd