From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52082)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1QfCjV-0007ob-05
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 11:12:46 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1QfCjT-0002pE-NV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 11:12:44 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51397)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1QfCjT-0002p9-8o
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 11:12:43 -0400
Message-ID: <4E171E64.9060804@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 17:12:36 +0200
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4E148776.4000805@redhat.com>	<4E149B3F.2010709@redhat.com>	<4E14BF36.3080803@codemonkey.ws>	<6E6E2CFC-B5BB-4E1D-945D-1F13C604330B@suse.de>	<4E155CB9.4020009@redhat.com>	<4E15608D.5000201@redhat.com>	<4E16FFE0.7050709@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA8Z27JPitMZh5Arh84-1sReSd84Ldra7J4CuAEiTNMLKw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8Z27JPitMZh5Arh84-1sReSd84Ldra7J4CuAEiTNMLKw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] migration: new sections and backward compatibility.
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>, Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>

On 07/08/11 16:43, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 8 July 2011 14:02, Jes Sorensen<Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>  wrote:
>> It seems reasonable to me to introduce a situation where devices have to
>> explicitly marked as migration compatible and fail if there are devices
>> in the system which are not.
>
> To ask a dumb question: does "migration" here mean only "migration"
> or also "vmsave/vmload" ?

Both.

cheers,
   Gerd