From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43772) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qgwwb-0008BC-Hu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:45:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qgwwa-0008Lg-7I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:45:29 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40028) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgwwZ-0008Lb-P6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:45:28 -0400 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6DAjQER026381 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:45:26 -0400 Received: from rincewind.home.kraxel.org (vpn1-4-150.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.4.150]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6DAjP7R014401 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:45:26 -0400 Message-ID: <4E1D7744.9090105@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:45:24 +0200 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1310478932-25370-1-git-send-email-alevy@redhat.com> <4E1D3EAD.1010600@redhat.com> <20110713085105.GA28430@bow.tlv.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20110713085105.GA28430@bow.tlv.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv3] async + suspend reworked List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 07/13/11 10:51, Alon Levy wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 08:43:57AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> On 07/12/11 15:55, Alon Levy wrote: >>> v2->v3: >>> builds correctly with older and newer spice, and runs with older and newer qxl driver. >>> fixed update_area_async to not use QXLRect on stack >>> qxl-render updated to work with update_area_async correctly >>> reverted change to update_area api - update_area still returns dirty >>> rects array >> >> Hmm? No patch numbers in the subject? That makes the patch order >> unclear ... >> > > Sorry, I don't understand what you mean? The subject line of the patches says just [patch] not [patch index/total] which makes it hard to figure the patch ordering ... cheers, Gerd