Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] scsi fixes

[Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>]

On 07/19/2011 09:39 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 19.07.2011 08:31, schrieb Hannes Reinecke:
>> On 07/12/2011 03:37 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>> Am 11.07.2011 15:02, schrieb Hannes Reinecke:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> these are some fixes I found during debugging my megasas HBA emulation.
>>>> This time I've sent them as a separate patchset for inclusion.
>>>> All of them have been acked, so please apply.
>>>>
>>>> Hannes Reinecke (4):
>>>>     iov: Update parameter usage in iov_(to|from)_buf()
>>>>     scsi: Add 'hba_private' to SCSIRequest
>>>>     scsi-disk: Fixup debugging statement
>>>>     scsi-disk: Mask out serial number EVPD
>>>
>>> Thanks, applied all to the block branch.
>>>
>> Any chance to have them pulled into the main tree?
>> My megasas emulation relies on them, and it feels a bit
>> stupid to send a patch relying on some fixes not in mainline.
>> At the same time it's really stupid to resend the entire
>> patchset again ...
>
> I'm hoping to send a pull request today, now that the VMDK patches look
> good finally.
>
> Anyway, I don't think that not having the patches in master yet should
> stop you from going forward with the next patches. They will go through
> the block tree anyway, so basing them on that tree is fine (and you
> wouldn't be the first one to do that). Just state in PATCH 0/n for the
> reviewers that it depends on the other patches.
>
Well, the remaining patch is 'just' the megasas emulation itself.
And I want to make reviewing that as easy as possible, so that it's 
not again being held off by complains about missing patches.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)