From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52560) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qj5OL-0001fC-7l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 04:11:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qj5OG-0007K7-RQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 04:10:56 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:44328 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qj5OG-0007Jp-22 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 04:10:52 -0400 Message-ID: <4E253C07.90008@suse.de> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 10:10:47 +0200 From: Hannes Reinecke MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1310389346-30790-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <4E1C4E2D.50501@redhat.com> <4E2524CF.3080309@suse.de> <4E2534A1.4000701@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4E2534A1.4000701@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] scsi fixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Stefan Haynoczi , Alexander Graf , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 07/19/2011 09:39 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 19.07.2011 08:31, schrieb Hannes Reinecke: >> On 07/12/2011 03:37 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >>> Am 11.07.2011 15:02, schrieb Hannes Reinecke: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> these are some fixes I found during debugging my megasas HBA emulati= on. >>>> This time I've sent them as a separate patchset for inclusion. >>>> All of them have been acked, so please apply. >>>> >>>> Hannes Reinecke (4): >>>> iov: Update parameter usage in iov_(to|from)_buf() >>>> scsi: Add 'hba_private' to SCSIRequest >>>> scsi-disk: Fixup debugging statement >>>> scsi-disk: Mask out serial number EVPD >>> >>> Thanks, applied all to the block branch. >>> >> Any chance to have them pulled into the main tree? >> My megasas emulation relies on them, and it feels a bit >> stupid to send a patch relying on some fixes not in mainline. >> At the same time it's really stupid to resend the entire >> patchset again ... > > I'm hoping to send a pull request today, now that the VMDK patches look > good finally. > > Anyway, I don't think that not having the patches in master yet should > stop you from going forward with the next patches. They will go through > the block tree anyway, so basing them on that tree is fine (and you > wouldn't be the first one to do that). Just state in PATCH 0/n for the > reviewers that it depends on the other patches. > Well, the remaining patch is 'just' the megasas emulation itself. And I want to make reviewing that as easy as possible, so that it's=20 not again being held off by complains about missing patches. Cheers, Hannes --=20 Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imend=F6rffer, HRB 16746 (AG N=FCrnberg)