From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39190) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGm4-0000Jh-Ke for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:32:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGm3-0006sg-Jx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:32:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:8362) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QkGm3-0006sb-AL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:32:19 -0400 Message-ID: <4E2989E5.4000708@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:32:05 +0200 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1311156579-9814-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <4E29876E.9090808@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4E29876E.9090808@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL] non-migratable devices List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, >> vmstate: complain about devices without vmstate > > I appreciate the sentiment of this patch but this cannot go into 0.15. Peter Maydell noted that too, thats why there already is a migration.2 branch with this patch dropped which you can pull instead. > I'm not really sure this is totally appropriate for the development > branch either. I think something like a migration tainted flag that > showed in info migrate would be much more appropriate. We can discuss that after 0.15 is out of the door. I'm certainly open to suggestions how to handle that in a better way. cheers, Gerd