From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56175) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QlJbf-0002E0-P9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:45:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QlJbe-0000XS-Rk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:45:55 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:64158) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QlJbe-0000XO-Is for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:45:54 -0400 Message-ID: <4E2D576C.6090309@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:45:48 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1311583872-362-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <4E2D448C.9030306@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Introduce QEMU_NEW() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: Kevin Wolf , Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org On 07/25/2011 02:02 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Side-stepping the stupid "OMG malloc(0) is weird, therefore we must make > qemu_malloc(0) differently weird" controversy would be useful all by > itself. If we all work together, we can make this thread even bigger than the tools/kvm pull request. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function