From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Frediano Ziglio <freddy77@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] qcow2: group refcount updates during cow
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:15:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E316EFD.6080304@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311861017-13425-1-git-send-email-freddy77@gmail.com>
Am 28.07.2011 15:50, schrieb Frediano Ziglio:
> Well, I think this is the first real improve patch.
> Is more a RFC than a patch. Yes, some lines are terrible!
> It collapses refcount decrement during cow.
> From a first check time executing 015 test passed from about 600 seconds
> to 70.
> This at least prove that refcount updates counts!
> Some doubt:
> 1- place the code in qcow2-refcount.c as it update only refcount and not
> cluster?
> 2- allow some sort of "begin transaction" / "commit" / "rollback" like
> databases instead?
> 3- allow changing tables from different coroutines?
>
> 1) If you have a sequence like (1, 2, 4) probably these clusters are all in
> the same l2 table but with this code you get two write instead of one.
> I'm thinking about a function in qcow2-refcount.c that accept an array of cluster
> instead of a start + len.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <freddy77@gmail.com>
I think what you're seeing is actually just one special case of a more
general problem. The problem is that we're interpreting writethrough
stricter than required.
The semantics that we really need is that on completion of a request,
all of its data and metadata must be flushed to disk. There is no
requirement that we flush all intermediate states.
My recent update to qcow2_update_snapshot_refcount() is just another
case of the same problem. I think the solution should be similar to what
I did there, i.e. switch the cache to writeback mode while we're
operating on it and switch back when we're done. We should probably have
functions that make both of this a one-liner (I think here we have some
similarity to your begin/commit idea).
With the right functions, this could become as easy as this (might need
better function names, but you get the idea):
diff --git a/block/qcow2-cluster.c b/block/qcow2-cluster.c
index 882f50a..45b67b1 100644
--- a/block/qcow2-cluster.c
+++ b/block/qcow2-cluster.c
@@ -612,6 +612,8 @@ int qcow2_alloc_cluster_link_l2(BlockDriverState
*bs, QCowL2Meta *m)
if (m->nb_clusters == 0)
return 0;
+ qcow2_cache_disable_writethrough(bs);
+
old_cluster = qemu_malloc(m->nb_clusters * sizeof(uint64_t));
/* copy content of unmodified sectors */
@@ -683,6 +685,7 @@ int qcow2_alloc_cluster_link_l2(BlockDriverState
*bs, QCowL2Meta *m)
ret = 0;
err:
+ qcow2_cache_restore_writethrough(bs);
qemu_free(old_cluster);
return ret;
}
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-28 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-28 13:50 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] qcow2: group refcount updates during cow Frediano Ziglio
2011-07-28 14:15 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2011-07-29 10:54 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E316EFD.6080304@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=freddy77@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).