qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Umesh Deshpande <udeshpan@redhat.com>
Cc: mtosatti@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] fine grained qemu_mutex locking for migration
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 11:39:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E36746A.6040901@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f4440591ca4843adff3a588864199ace81e5f11c.1311971938.git.udeshpan@redhat.com>

On 07/29/2011 10:57 PM, Umesh Deshpande wrote:
> +    qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
>
>       while (s->state == MIG_STATE_ACTIVE) {
>           if (migrate_fd_check_expire()) {
> +            qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
>               buffered_rate_tick(s->file);
> +            qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
>           }
>
>           if (s->state != MIG_STATE_ACTIVE) {
> @@ -392,12 +396,11 @@ void migrate_fd_begin(void *arg)
>
>           if (s->callback) {
>               migrate_fd_wait_for_unfreeze(s);
> +            qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
>               s->callback(s);
> +            qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
>           }
>       }
> -
> -out:
> -    qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();

I think it's clearer to unlock explicitly around the waiting points (see 
review of 1/3).  In fact, I think you're working around the busy wait by 
accessing s->state outside the lock, right?  I don't think this is 
provably safe; moving the knowledge of the thread entirely within 
buffered_file.c also fixes this, because then the lifetimes of the 
thread and the QEMUFile are much clearer.

Thanks,

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-01  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-29 20:57 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] separate thread for VM migration Umesh Deshpande
2011-07-29 20:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] " Umesh Deshpande
2011-08-01  9:37   ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-08-01 21:00     ` Umesh Deshpande
2011-08-02  7:44       ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-07-29 20:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] fine grained qemu_mutex locking for migration Umesh Deshpande
2011-08-01  9:39   ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2011-08-02 16:30   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-07-29 20:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] Per memslot dirty bitmap Umesh Deshpande
2011-08-02 16:29   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-01  9:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] separate thread for VM migration shawn che

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E36746A.6040901@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    --cc=udeshpan@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).