From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34820) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QosBg-0000H4-1d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 03:17:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QosBe-0001Dq-VK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 03:17:48 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50729) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QosBe-0001DX-NO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 03:17:46 -0400 Message-ID: <4E3A4794.2070605@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 09:17:40 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1312326516-10117-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <4E389258.6040007@us.ibm.com> <4E38EE6B.80700@redhat.com> <4E398919.80900@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4E398919.80900@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: remove subsections in fdc and rtl8139 and bump versions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, quintela@redhat.com On 08/03/2011 07:44 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> >> >> Not really true, with my series you can migrate new to old if you use >> pc-0.xx as the machine on the source too. > > But that is dangerous, no? It suffers from the same problem with > subsections. Not in the common case where the source does not publish the subsection. Paolo