From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, quintela@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: remove subsections in fdc and rtl8139 and bump versions
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 16:36:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E3AAE6B.9030701@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E3A97B5.6000002@redhat.com>
On 08/04/2011 02:59 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> >
>> > I have. If we are changing a protocol in an incompatible version, we
>> > can remove a lot of warts that current descriptions have. Not that
>> > Paolo protocol is bad, but if we are going to do some change, adding
>> > things like size, removing previous warts, etc is the way to go.
> So how about stating clearly that migrating between 0.x and 1.x won't
> work and using the next few months to develop a sane migration protocol?
I think that's too early to state, perhaps we can keep backwards
compatibility---who knows.
And in case we totally screw up in 1.x, we still have my tweaked format
as a backup.
> We'll still have to do something about 0.15 and it's not very nice to
> break migration twice, but seems there is no way around it.
There is! Migration didn't break _that_ much with subsections, exactly
because the buggy case occurs when subsections are sent and subsections
are rare. If we always send them, as we did in practice with the
floppy, we break stuff. That's why for 0.15 reverting the floppy fix is
the simplest course of action.
Paolo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-04 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-02 23:08 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: remove subsections in fdc and rtl8139 and bump versions Anthony Liguori
2011-08-02 23:17 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-02 23:25 ` Juan Quintela
2011-08-03 0:12 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-03 6:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-08-03 17:44 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-04 7:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-08-03 9:00 ` Juan Quintela
2011-08-03 17:49 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-03 21:42 ` Juan Quintela
2011-08-04 7:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-08-04 13:20 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-04 14:09 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-08-04 14:30 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-04 15:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-08-04 20:31 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-04 12:59 ` Kevin Wolf
2011-08-04 13:12 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-04 14:36 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E3AAE6B.9030701@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).