From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51094)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1Qp4ZP-0007t8-PM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 16:31:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1Qp4ZN-00010L-LO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 16:31:07 -0400
Received: from mail-pz0-f42.google.com ([209.85.210.42]:46028)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1Qp4ZN-000105-AK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 16:31:05 -0400
Received: by pzk37 with SMTP id 37so3054434pzk.29
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 13:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E3B0184.6090506@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:31:00 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1312326516-10117-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com>	<m3ty9zjt09.fsf@neno.neno>
	<4E389258.6040007@us.ibm.com>	<m3sjpidg4h.fsf@neno.neno>
	<4E398A44.8060507@codemonkey.ws>	<m3bow6cgtr.fsf@neno.neno>
	<4E3A48BE.2060302@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E3A48BE.2060302@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: remove subsections in fdc and
 rtl8139 and bump versions
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, quintela@redhat.com

On 08/04/2011 02:22 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 08/03/2011 11:42 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> > I can certainly limit the change to IDE if we think machine, floppy,
>> > and rtl8139 are safe.
>>
>> Ok, only IDE is broken, something done if we are not reverting the
>> others.
>
> Floppy is broken too, and has the problem that the subsection is sent
> almost always. On the other hand IDE is only broken if we have
> subsections, and that is a rare case.
>
> So perhaps the best course of action is to only fix floppy, either as in
> your patch or by reverting 7d905f71. Let's keep IDE as it is broken as
> 0.14 was, and apply my patch to master. I'll rebase as soon as there is
> agreement this is the way to go.

Okay, I'm on board and this is what I'm going to do.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> Paolo
>