From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Gerhard Wiesinger <lists@wiesinger.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Fix wide ioport access cracking
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:44:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E43A482.5040401@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1108111040590.4090@bbs.intern>
On 08/11/2011 12:01 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> Hello Avi,
>
> #0 0x0000003a060328f5 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> #1 0x0000003a060340d5 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> #2 0x0000003a0602b8b5 in __assert_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> #3 0x0000000000435339 in memory_region_del_subregion (mr=<value
> optimized out>, subregion=<value optimized out>) at
> /root/download/qemu/git/qemu-kvm-test/memory.c:1168
> #4 0x000000000041eb9b in pci_update_mappings (d=0x1a90bc0) at
> /root/download/qemu/git/qemu-kvm-test/hw/pci.c:1134
> #5 0x0000000000420a9c in pci_default_write_config (d=0x1a90bc0,
> addr=4, val=<value optimized out>, l=<value optimized out>) at
> /root/download/qemu/git/qemu-kvm-test/hw/pci.c:1213
> #6 0x00000000004329a6 in kvm_handle_io (env=0x1931af0) at
> /root/download/qemu/git/qemu-kvm-test/kvm-all.c:858
> #7 kvm_cpu_exec (env=0x1931af0) at
> /root/download/qemu/git/qemu-kvm-test/kvm-all.c:997
> #8 0x000000000040bd4a in qemu_kvm_cpu_thread_fn (arg=0x1931af0) at
> /root/download/qemu/git/qemu-kvm-test/cpus.c:806
> #9 0x0000003a06807761 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
> #10 0x0000003a060e098d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6
>
In frame 4, can you print out i, *r, and d->io_regions[0 through 6]?
Some of them may be optimized out unfortunately.
>
> BTW: Is the new memory API faster? Any ideas how to optimize (if not)?
>
Currently it has no effect on run time performance.
> I don't know if you remember but I was looking for fast access for the
> following use cases for DOS legacy for KVM:
> 1.) Page switching in the area of 0xA0000-0xAFFFF (linear frame buffer
> mapping) through INT 0x10 function
> 2.) Access the memory page
>
> As far as I saw there are 2 different virtualization approaches
> (different in VMWare VGA and cirrus VGA):
> 1.) Just remember the page on the INT 0x10 function setter and
> virtualize each access to the page.
> Advantages: Fast page switching
> Disadvantages: Each access is virtualized which is slow (you pointed
> out that each switch from non virtualized to virtualized is very slow
> and requires thousands of CPU cycles, see archive)
>
> 2.) mapping in the INT 0x10 function through memory mapping functions
> and direct access to the mapped memory area without virtualization.
> Advantages: Fast direct access
> Disadvantages with old API: was very slow (was about 1000 switches per
> second or even lower as far as I remember)
> As far as I found it out it came from (maybe a linear list issue?):
> static int cpu_notify_sync_dirty_bitmap(target_phys_addr_t start,
> target_phys_addr_t end)
> {
> CPUPhysMemoryClient *client;
> QLIST_FOREACH(client, &memory_client_list, list) {
> int r = client->sync_dirty_bitmap(client, start, end);
> if (r < 0)
> return r;
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
> kvm_physical_sync_dirty_bitmap
>
> I think variant 2 is the preferred one but with optimized switching of
> mapping.
This should be faster today with really new kernels (the problem is not
in qemu) but I'm not sure if it's fast enough.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-11 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-11 7:40 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Fix wide ioport access cracking Avi Kivity
2011-08-11 7:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] memory: abstract cracking of write access ops into a function Avi Kivity
2011-08-11 7:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] memory: crack wide ioport accesses into smaller ones when needed Avi Kivity
2011-08-11 8:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Fix wide ioport access cracking Gerhard Wiesinger
2011-08-11 8:27 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-11 8:29 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-11 9:01 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2011-08-11 9:44 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-08-11 16:08 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2011-08-11 16:20 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-11 16:22 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-11 19:01 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2011-08-22 10:46 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-11 16:11 ` Gerhard Wiesinger
2011-08-11 16:15 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-22 14:42 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E43A482.5040401@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@wiesinger.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).