From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35798) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QrtyL-0002ua-5k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:48:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QrtyK-0007Rb-3R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:48:33 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41762) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QrtyJ-0007RV-SO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:48:32 -0400 Message-ID: <4E454B4C.1060107@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:48:28 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1312361359-15445-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <4E452F55.3010704@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4E452F55.3010704@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/16] SCSI sense and target request overhaul List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster On 08/12/2011 03:49 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> > > Applied all. Thanks. > > It fuzzed a bit, it seems pretty trivial to me but wouldn't hurt to > double check. I tested SCSI quite a bit afterwards too. Thanks. Sorry Markus, you'll have a bit of conflict resolution to do. I can help if you want. Paolo