From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52474) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QtZcd-00078o-4h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 02:29:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QtZcb-0004ls-WB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 02:29:03 -0400 Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com ([209.85.210.171]:41595) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QtZcb-0004lf-SB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 02:29:01 -0400 Received: by iyf13 with SMTP id 13so1348707iyf.30 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 23:29:00 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4E4B5FA8.4020006@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 23:28:56 -0700 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8f99d56f3a48b6255cf70425bc435d8f231f5352.1313552764.git.udeshpan@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <8f99d56f3a48b6255cf70425bc435d8f231f5352.1313552764.git.udeshpan@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v4 2/5] ramlist mutex List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Umesh Deshpande Cc: mtosatti@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, quintela@redhat.com On 08/16/2011 08:56 PM, Umesh Deshpande wrote: > @@ -3001,8 +3016,10 @@ void qemu_ram_free_from_ptr(ram_addr_t addr) > > QLIST_FOREACH(block,&ram_list.blocks, next) { > if (addr == block->offset) { > + qemu_mutex_lock_ramlist(); > QLIST_REMOVE(block, next); > QLIST_REMOVE(block, next_mru); > + qemu_mutex_unlock_ramlist(); > qemu_free(block); > return; > } > @@ -3015,8 +3032,10 @@ void qemu_ram_free(ram_addr_t addr) > > QLIST_FOREACH(block,&ram_list.blocks, next) { > if (addr == block->offset) { > + qemu_mutex_lock_ramlist(); > QLIST_REMOVE(block, next); > QLIST_REMOVE(block, next_mru); > + qemu_mutex_unlock_ramlist(); > if (block->flags& RAM_PREALLOC_MASK) { > ; > } else if (mem_path) { You must protect the whole QLIST_FOREACH. Otherwise looks good. Paolo