From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Brad <brad@comstyle.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-thread: add TLS wrappers
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 10:37:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E4BFC45.7050204@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAu8pHuWJMvXr6D=zJTyrDPLiG-eruyZAgCjnZOez8HdA7DUAQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/17/2011 10:28 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>> >> The actual use of TLS within QEMU on POSIX systems will be optional
>>> >> though, right?
>> >
>> > Actually, TLS is already mandatory for both POSIX and Win32 systems.
> Not true, we have avoided TLS.
>
>> > This patch tries to improve the situation on Windows, both by allowing older
>> > GCC versions, and by making TLS faster. On ELF systems, TLS has been
>> > supported by GCC for perhaps 10 years, there's no reason to care.
> GCC may support it but it can't use it on a platform if the other
> parts are missing (libc etc.).
Again, welcome to the 21st century. There's no way you can have
something that is scalable and not use fast TLS. IMNSHO if OpenBSD
still wants to miss features that all sane OSes (and Windows _is_ sane)
have nowadays, fine, it will be stuck with an old QEMU or with
single-thread user-level emulation.
As far as portability is concerned, FreeBSD provides a much more
interesting target.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-17 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-16 18:51 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-thread: add TLS wrappers Paolo Bonzini
2011-08-17 4:36 ` Brad
2011-08-17 6:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-08-17 17:28 ` Blue Swirl
2011-08-17 17:37 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2011-08-17 19:00 ` Richard Henderson
2011-08-17 23:50 ` Brad
2011-08-17 23:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-08-17 16:51 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-08-17 17:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-08-17 17:26 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-08-17 17:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-08-17 17:37 ` Blue Swirl
2011-08-17 17:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-08-17 17:51 ` Blue Swirl
2011-08-17 18:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-08-17 18:32 ` malc
2011-08-17 23:41 ` Brad
2011-08-17 17:34 ` Blue Swirl
2011-08-17 17:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E4BFC45.7050204@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=brad@comstyle.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).