From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33626) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QtlzT-0005FL-7I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:41:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QtlzS-0002Uh-8c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:41:27 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32046) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QtlzS-0002Ua-1Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:41:26 -0400 Message-ID: <4E4C1961.1030408@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:41:21 -0700 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1313513145-5348-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> <1313513145-5348-3-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> <4E4BC5FA.1020409@redhat.com> <4E4C1161.3010205@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/14] isa: Add isa_register_old_portio_list(). List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Richard Henderson On 08/17/2011 12:32 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: > >> Please avoid g_new/g_malloc until they are taught to use qemu_malloc > >> or was it the other way around. > >> > > > > Why? > > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-07/msg02620.html I don't understand. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.