From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35888) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwTXh-0005MN-E0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 02:35:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwTXg-0002Vn-J9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 02:35:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:12708) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwTXg-0002Vh-Al for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 02:35:56 -0400 Message-ID: <4E55ED47.1070006@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 09:35:51 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4E55328A.8000203@codemonkey.ws> <4E55EBAF.1000409@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4E55EBAF.1000409@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 0/4] Separate thread for VM migration List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Umesh Deshpande Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, quintela@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com On 08/25/2011 09:29 AM, Umesh Deshpande wrote: > Jitterd Test > I ran jitterd in a migrating VM of size 8GB with and w/o the patch > series. > ./jitterd -f -m 1 -p 100 -r 40 > That is to report the jitter of greater than 400ms during the interval > of 40 seconds. > > Jitter in ms. with the migration thread. > Run Total (Peak) > 1 No chatter > 2 No chatter > 3 No chatter > 4 409 (360) > > Jitter in ms. without migration thread. > Run Total (Peak) > 1 4663 (2413) > 2 643 (423) > 3 1973 (1817) > 4 3908 (3772) > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Flood ping test : ping to the migrating VM from a third machine (data > over 3 runs) > Latency (ms) ping to a non-migrating VM : Avg 0.156, Max: 0.96 > Latency (ms) with migration thread : Avg 0.215, Max: 280 > Latency (ms) without migration thread : Avg 6.47, Max: 4562 > Very impressive numbers. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.