From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:54494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwhJ0-0002YZ-EU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:17:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwhIz-0003GC-H2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:17:42 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.160.173]:57923) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwhIz-0003G8-7s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:17:41 -0400 Received: by gyd12 with SMTP id 12so2430735gyd.4 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:17:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E56BBF2.40900@codemonkey.ws> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:17:38 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1314254480-22438-1-git-send-email-peter.crosthwaite@petalogix.com> <4E564DBC.8030801@codemonkey.ws> <4E56727C.3080809@codemonkey.ws> <20110825191054.GC21302@zapo> <4E56A865.5080409@codemonkey.ws> <20110825202057.GE21302@zapo> In-Reply-To: <20110825202057.GE21302@zapo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH V1 00/14] Dynamic machine model creation from device trees List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Edgar E. Iglesias" Cc: Grant Likely , stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Crosthwaite , michal.simek@petalogix.com, john.williams@petalogix.com On 08/25/2011 03:20 PM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 02:54:13PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> On 08/25/2011 02:10 PM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote: >>>> This is the goal of QOM except it does this by fixing the problems >>>> in qdev instead of adding another layer on top of things. >>> >>> >>> Then maybe the FDT machinery could be respinned to work on top of your QOM >>> objects? >>> >>> Or are FDT's a complete no go? So external conversion is the only option? >> >> No, DTS is fine but not as proposed. You shouldn't mix the logic of >> creating the nodes in the tree with the format of how you're >> describing what nodes to be there. > > Thanks. Would you mind spending a few lines on how far you've gotten with > QOM and if there is, where to find more info about it (sorry, I havent been > following it at all). Stay tuned. I'm going to spend the day tomorrow getting the next series ready and writing some stuff on the wiki. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > Cheers >