From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53643) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qwuy5-0002CW-KY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 07:53:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qwuy4-0003PM-Mi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 07:53:01 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:20792) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qwuy4-0003PI-EM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 07:53:00 -0400 Message-ID: <4E578916.1050509@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:52:54 +0200 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20110815202656.GA94934@triton8.kn-bremen.de> <4E577890.5030200@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4E577890.5030200@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu 0.15.0 testing, usb redirection, and libusb_get_device_speed() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Juergen Lock Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, hselasky@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, > /me wonders what FreeBSD tries to do here? This triggers even without a > single device connected and I can't think of a reason to use a siTD in > that case ... Ah, the siTD simply isn't active so we can just skip it. That is easy to do ;) cheers, Gerd