From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45488) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QxwYX-0003kx-TO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 03:46:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QxwYW-0005Kx-GH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 03:46:53 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1041) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QxwYW-0005Kq-9L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 03:46:52 -0400 Message-ID: <4E5B43DD.6060505@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 09:46:37 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20110826141554.GE32250@gnx2503> <20110826142807.GF32250@gnx2503> <20110829072421.GA909@gnx2503> In-Reply-To: <20110829072421.GA909@gnx2503> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Regression in QEMU user-mode (Was: "tcg: Reload local variables after return from longjmp") List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: cedric.vincent@st.com, Blue Swirl , Peter Maydell , Jan Kiszka , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Riku Voipio On 08/29/2011 09:24 AM, cedric.vincent@st.com wrote: >> > >> > Since you seem to have a nice test case close at hand, could you >> > please test the fix proposed by Paolo? > I suppose you are talking about this one: > > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-08/msg01655.html > > This patch can't fix the problem since it isn't related to the user > mode. The patch is only partial, it is the Windows-specific part. Paolo