qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Osier Yang <jyang@redhat.com>
To: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, Adam Litke <agl@us.ibm.com>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, hutao@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] block I/O throttling: how to enable in libvirt
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:21:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E5F0840.5010203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110901035517.GD16985@f15.cn.ibm.com>

于 2011年09月01日 11:55, Zhi Yong Wu 写道:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 08:18:19AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> Subject: Re: The design choice for how to enable block I/O throttling
>> function in libvirt
>> From: Stefan Hajnoczi<stefanha@gmail.com>
>> To: Adam Litke<agl@us.ibm.com>
>> Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com, "Daniel P. Berrange"<berrange@redhat.com>, Zhi
>> Yong Wu<wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Zhi Yong Wu<zwu.kernel@gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>> X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
>> X-Xagent-From: stefanha@gmail.com
>> X-Xagent-To: wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com
>> X-Xagent-Gateway: bldgate.vnet.ibm.com (XAGENTU7 at BLDGATE)
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Adam Litke<agl@us.ibm.com>  wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:53:33AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Zhi Yong Wu<zwu.kernel@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>>> I am trying to enable block I/O throttling function in libvirt. But
>>>>> currently i met some design questions, and don't make sure if we
>>>>> should extend blkiotune to support block I/O throttling or introduce
>>>>> one new libvirt command "blkiothrottle" to cover it or not. If you
>>>>> have some better idea, pls don't hesitate to drop your comments.
>>>> A little bit of context: this discussion is about adding libvirt
>>>> support for QEMU disk I/O throttling.
>>> Thanks for the additional context Stefan.
>>>
>>>> Today libvirt supports the cgroups blkio-controller, which handles
>>>> proportional shares and throughput/iops limits on host block devices.
>>>> blkio-controller does not support network file systems (NFS) or other
>>>> QEMU remote block drivers (curl, Ceph/rbd, sheepdog) since they are
>>>> not host block devices.  QEMU I/O throttling works with all types of
>>>> -drive and therefore complements blkio-controller.
>>> The first question that pops into my mind is: Should a user need to understand
>>> when to use the cgroups blkio-controller vs. the QEMU I/O throttling method?  In
>>> my opinion, it would be nice if libvirt had a single interface for block I/O
>>> throttling and libvirt would decide which mechanism to use based on the type of
>>> device and the specific limits that need to be set.
>> Yes, I agree it would be simplest to pick the right mechanism,
>> depending on the type of throttling the user wants.  More below.
>>
>>>> I/O throttling can be applied independently to each -drive attached to
>>>> a guest and supports throughput/iops limits.  For more information on
>>>> this QEMU feature and a comparison with blkio-controller, see Ryan
>>>> Harper's KVM Forum 2011 presentation:
>>>> http://www.linux-kvm.org/wiki/images/7/72/2011-forum-keep-a-limit-on-it-io-throttling-in-qemu.pdf
>>>  From the presentation, it seems that both the cgroups method the the qemu method
>>> offer comparable control (assuming a block device) so it might possible to apply
>>> either method from the same API in a transparent manner.  Am I correct or are we
>>> suggesting that the Qemu throttling approach should always be used for Qemu
>>> domains?
>> QEMU I/O throttling does not provide a proportional share mechanism.
>> So you cannot assign weights to VMs and let them receive a fraction of
>> the available disk time.  That is only supported by cgroups
>> blkio-controller because it requires a global view which QEMU does not
>> have.
>>
>> So I think the two are complementary:
>>
>> If proportional share should be used on a host block device, use
>> cgroups blkio-controller.
>> Otherwise use QEMU I/O throttling.
> Stefan,
>
> Do you agree with introducing one new libvirt command blkiothrottle now?
> If so, i will work on the code draft to make it work.
>
> Danial and other maintainers,
>
> If you are available, can you make some comments for us?:)

Seems you posted to wrong list? This should be discussed in libvir-list
instead.

And if you meant to post to libvir-list, then s/Danial/Daniel/  :-)

>
> Regards,
>
> Zhi Yong Wu
>> Stefan

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-01  4:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-30  2:55 [Qemu-devel] The design choice for how to enable block I/O throttling function in libvirt Zhi Yong Wu
2011-08-30  7:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] " shu ming
2011-08-30  8:10   ` Zhi Yong Wu
2011-08-30  8:31     ` shu ming
2011-08-30  8:36       ` Zhi Yong Wu
     [not found] ` <CAJSP0QW1CPCokX=F5z7y==vn1S4wH0VtOaQ7oj4kC7f7uQM4MQ@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]   ` <20110830134636.GB29130@aglitke.rchland.ibm.com>
     [not found]     ` <CAJSP0QUHm=y8XJC_KXRg7ufFZt3K_XDDfQb--sxjC+c0GjO8qg@mail.gmail.com>
2011-09-01  3:55       ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC] block I/O throttling: how to enable " Zhi Yong Wu
2011-09-01  4:21         ` Osier Yang [this message]
2011-09-01  4:51           ` Zhi Yong Wu
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-09-01  5:05 Zhi Yong Wu
2011-09-01  8:11 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-09-01  8:49   ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-09-02  1:16   ` Gui Jianfeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E5F0840.5010203@redhat.com \
    --to=jyang@redhat.com \
    --cc=agl@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=hutao@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    --cc=wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).