From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57525) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QzQoe-0005VX-5B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 06:17:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QzQod-0007FZ-11 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 06:17:40 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34148) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QzQoc-0007FP-Oz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 06:17:38 -0400 Message-ID: <4E60ADEC.3070903@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:20:28 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1312376904-16115-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <1312376904-16115-10-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1312376904-16115-10-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 09/45] ide/atapi: Clean up misleading name in cmd_start_stop_unit() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: quintela@redhat.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com, hare@suse.de, amit.shah@redhat.com, hch@lst.de Am 03.08.2011 15:07, schrieb Markus Armbruster: > "eject" is misleading; it means "eject" when start is clear, but > "load" when start is set. Rename to loej, because that's how MMC-5 > calls it, in section 6.40. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster > --- > hw/ide/atapi.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/ide/atapi.c b/hw/ide/atapi.c > index fe2fb0b..17fbef8 100644 > --- a/hw/ide/atapi.c > +++ b/hw/ide/atapi.c > @@ -892,11 +892,11 @@ static void cmd_seek(IDEState *s, uint8_t* buf) > > static void cmd_start_stop_unit(IDEState *s, uint8_t* buf) > { > - int start, eject, sense, err = 0; > - start = buf[4] & 1; > - eject = (buf[4] >> 1) & 1; > + int sense, err = 0; > + bool start = buf[4] & 1; > + bool loej = buf[4] & 2; > > - if (eject) { > + if (loej) { > err = bdrv_eject(s->bs, !start); > } > "eject" has the advantage that I immediately know that it's something to do with the tray. "loej" on the other hand is a sequence of four random characters. Maybe add a comment? Kevin