From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50003) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QzWsU-0007fa-1P for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:46:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QzWsT-0000GI-2X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:46:02 -0400 Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.144]:47958) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QzWsT-0000F3-04 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:46:01 -0400 Received: from d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (d01relay05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.237]) by e4.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p82GM9cA004770 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 12:22:09 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay05.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p82GjXtC188830 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 12:45:33 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p82CjIL2002119 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 09:45:20 -0300 Message-ID: <4E610828.8050007@us.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 11:45:28 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1314211389-28915-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <1314211389-28915-4-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <4E567724.7020601@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4E60FDB2.7060708@codemonkey.ws> <20110902130931.50b0f63a@doriath> <4E6104F5.6010202@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <4E6104F5.6010202@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/14] qapi: use middle mode in QMP server List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Roth Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Luiz Capitulino On 09/02/2011 11:31 AM, Michael Roth wrote: >>> This ended up being a bit harder than I initially thought so I'd prefer >>> to delay this to another series so we can start converting commands to >>> QAPI ASAP. >> >> Fine with me. > > Same. Curious what the complications are though, I wouldn't mind looking > at it. The current dispatch and error checking logic in the QMP server scares me. It wasn't immediately obvious if just adding another else clause in the dispatch logic was enough. I could be wrong though. Regards, Anthony Liguori