From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45111)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1R0EuN-0006V1-Hr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 11:46:56 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1R0EuM-0006Rp-Cx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 11:46:55 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:65095)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1R0EuM-0006Rh-5u
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 11:46:54 -0400
Message-ID: <4E639D66.6090506@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 18:46:46 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20110904130159.GB23500@redhat.com> <4E63778A.6050002@redhat.com>
	<20110904134101.GA27239@redhat.com> <4E638355.8030903@redhat.com>
	<20110904142152.GB27239@redhat.com> <4E638D08.10307@redhat.com>
	<20110904145425.GC27239@redhat.com> <4E6395CE.3010309@redhat.com>
	<20110904152409.GA30376@redhat.com> <4E639B24.7090100@redhat.com>
	<20110904154519.GA31273@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110904154519.GA31273@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: add standard bridge device
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 09/04/2011 06:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 06:37:08PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >  On 09/04/2011 06:24 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >  >>
> >  >>   Of course it doesn't ignore it.  See the 440fx implementation, if
> >  >>   you disable VGA access (via the SMRAM register), vga goes away.
> >  >
> >  >Yes but that's for VGA RAM, right? I'm talking about the IO addresses:
> >  >are tons of aliases created as you suggest?
> >
> >  No.
>
> So a full 16 bit decode is done for now?
>

Correct.  But isn't it needed?  Otherwise why don't vga accesses alias 
with a virtio device at 0xc3c0?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function