From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39129)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1R1IC0-00045n-Ry
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:29:34 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1R1IBw-0004pz-2W
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:29:28 -0400
Received: from mail-yx0-f173.google.com ([209.85.213.173]:63769)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1R1IBv-0004pv-Ta
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:29:24 -0400
Received: by yxt3 with SMTP id 3so4406539yxt.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 06:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E6771B1.1030907@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 08:29:21 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAGZKiBr0G-boxFCmt-mL9Qu56Ubn3tkSndCHiNz79tB094L7xw@mail.gmail.com>	<4E676AC7.7030405@codemonkey.ws>
	<CAGZKiBrT6SMYpuJR+PDbwOD3qnvbk3T17fdjS41Xmxe7Fo3WMQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGZKiBrT6SMYpuJR+PDbwOD3qnvbk3T17fdjS41Xmxe7Fo3WMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [FIX] X86 CPU topology broken in KVM mode
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@gmail.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>

On 09/07/2011 08:24 AM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Anthony Liguori<anthony@codemonkey.ws>  wrote:
>> On 09/06/2011 11:21 PM, Bharata B Rao wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>> Please post patches as top-level threads with [PATCH] in the subject.
>
> I posted a new thread and hence it has appeared as a top-level thread.
>
> This was a fix and hence used [FIX], but if this mailing list expects
> [PATCH], then will use it from next time.
>
>> Please
>> use git diff or better yet, git-send-email.
>
> This was a small patch and hence used quilt. If you insist, I can use
> git for the next post :)

It's not strictly required, but git includes extra information in the 
patch it generates (base revision) which git-am can use to merge the 
patch via a 3way merge instead of patch fuzz.  That makes life a bit 
easier when you're applying a lot of patches.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> Regards,
> Bharata.
>