From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] main: switch qemu_set_fd_handler to g_io_add_watch
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:53:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E67855F.90004@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E678267.4020905@redhat.com>
On 09/07/2011 09:40 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 09/07/2011 02:42 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 09/07/2011 02:03 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 09/06/2011 05:59 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>> So it should be possible to add a new Source type that just selects
>>>> on a
>>>> file descriptor and avoid GIOChannels?
>>>
>>> I think you still have the problem that glib on Windows waits for
>>> HANDLEs, not file descriptors. Also, I'm not sure it's worth it though
>>> as long as slirp still does its own fill/poll.
>>
>> So how do we fix this long term?
>
> Long term, we use GIOChannels for everything, assuming that's possible
> at all. More realistically, we could rewrite socket handling on Windows
> so that we can use g_poll instead of select (don't wait for me doing that).
I assume switching to GIO would resolve all of these issues?
>
> Another possibility, the ugliest but also the most realistic, is to
> separate the Windows and POSIX implementations of the main loop more
> sharply. This way glib's main loop can be integrated (differently) into
> both implementations.
>
> In the meanwhile: just do not rely on glib sources on Windows. There
> isn't any large benefit in this patch, and it actually complicates the
> straightforward code in iohandler. Just revert it and #ifdef the glib
> integration in patch 1/2. Since I don't see a 100%-glib main loop
> anytime soon, we are unlikely to lose much. If anybody introduces a
> feature that requires Avahi or GTK+, it won't be supported on Windows.
My main motivation is unit testing. I want to be able to have device
models only rely on glib main loop primitives such that we can easily
use devices in a simple glib main loop.
The split main loop approach won't work for that.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
>
>> We seem to get away with using fds
>> today and not HANDLEs, do fds on Windows not work the same with poll as
>> they do with select?
>
> Here is a summary table:
>
> select socket HANDLEs only
> poll does not exist
> WaitForMultipleObjects all other HANDLEs
> g_poll all other HANDLEs
>
> We only use select for Windows socket handles today. Everything else is
> handled separately (with WaitForMultipleObjects) by
> osdep-win32.c/oslib-win32.c.
>
> Paolo
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-07 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-22 13:12 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Add glib support to main loop Anthony Liguori
2011-08-22 13:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] main: switch qemu_set_fd_handler to g_io_add_watch Anthony Liguori
2011-08-22 13:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-08-22 13:45 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-08-22 13:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-06 14:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-06 15:59 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-09-07 7:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-07 8:08 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-07 12:42 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-09-07 14:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-07 14:53 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2011-09-07 15:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-24 17:11 ` Fabien Chouteau
2011-11-24 17:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-25 10:24 ` Fabien Chouteau
2011-11-25 10:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-25 14:46 ` Fabien Chouteau
2011-11-25 14:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-25 15:33 ` Fabien Chouteau
2011-11-25 15:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-25 16:56 ` Fabien Chouteau
2011-11-25 19:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-11-28 9:13 ` Fabien Chouteau
2011-09-04 14:03 ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-04 14:51 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-09-04 15:01 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-09-07 12:54 ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-05 9:46 ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-01 18:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Add glib support to main loop Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E67855F.90004@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).