From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35318) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3sSX-0007Y4-Mt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:37:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3sSV-0000Op-Gk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:37:13 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.216.173]:61883) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3sSV-0000OT-ET for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:37:11 -0400 Received: by qyc1 with SMTP id 1so3582128qyc.4 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:37:10 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4E70D82F.504@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:37:03 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1315628610-28222-1-git-send-email-ronniesahlberg@gmail.com> <4E6DC94C.4090503@redhat.com> <1316003085.2317.28.camel@dhcp-1-120.tlv.redhat.com> <20110914143754.GC12218@lst.de> <20110914154033.GA13411@lst.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add iSCSI support for QEMU List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Kevin Wolf , stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp, Orit Wasserman , RonnieSahlberg , Christoph Hellwig On 09/14/2011 05:51 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > Why do we need to use the complex iSCSI protocol for that instead of > > simply using NBD? > > I think NBD would be fine, especially with a flush command. Indeed: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/113639 iSCSI is still very useful to easily deploy remote storage, and more long term for passthrough to an HBA provided by QEMU (as an alternative to scsi-generic). Paolo