From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] hw/usb-ohci: Honour endpoint maximum packet size
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:13:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E71C1B0.5070607@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8O69D5e5ojdKBM+qJHLXYyzs8fhkGPu0MUnW8uBw04cg@mail.gmail.com>
On 09/15/11 10:36, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 15 September 2011 08:33, Gerd Hoffmann<kraxel@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 09/14/11 19:48, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>>
>>> Honour the maximum packet size for endpoints; this applies when
>>> sending non-isochronous data and means we transfer only as
>>> much as the endpoint allows, leaving the transfer descriptor
>>> on the list for another go next time around. This allows
>>> usb-net to work when connected to an OHCI controller model.
>>
>> Hmm, I'd tend to fix it the other way around: Fix usb-net to deal with
>> transfers larger than the endpoint packet size. What do you think?
>
> Honouring maximum packet size is mandated by the OHCI spec:
> see section 4.3.1.3.2 "Packet Size" in OHCI specification 1.0a.
> Our failure to do it is just a bug in our controller model.
No. What I think is that USBPacket shouldn't be required to be an
actual USB packet, but a transfer, i.e. do the splitting of larger
transfers into smaller packets in the usb driver emulation (if needed),
not the host adapter emulation.
Maybe it is a good idea to rename USBPacket to USBTransfer to make that
clear.
> If you want to make our usb-net implementation permit and
> advertise a larger max-packet-size (and test it for
> interoperability with a pile of OSes :-)) that's a different
> thing.
Also add usb 2.0 support while being at it.
But that is another story ...
cheers,
Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-15 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-14 17:48 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] usb-ohci: fixes to allow usb-net to work Peter Maydell
2011-09-14 17:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] hw/usb-ohci: Honour endpoint maximum packet size Peter Maydell
2011-09-15 7:33 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-09-15 8:36 ` Peter Maydell
2011-09-15 9:13 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2011-09-15 10:08 ` Peter Maydell
2011-09-15 10:49 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-09-15 11:24 ` Peter Maydell
2011-09-15 11:45 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-09-14 17:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] hw/usb-ohci: Fix OHCI_TD_T1 bit position definition Peter Maydell
2011-09-15 7:34 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-10-10 16:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] usb-ohci: fixes to allow usb-net to work Peter Maydell
2011-10-11 7:10 ` Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E71C1B0.5070607@redhat.com \
--to=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).