From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49415) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R4Uzt-0004ku-UO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 05:46:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R4Uzs-0007fV-Vs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 05:46:13 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1026) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R4Uzs-0007fK-Nv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 05:46:12 -0400 Message-ID: <4E731AE0.40008@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:46:08 +0200 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4E722279.2030007@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] usb: change VID/PID for usb-hub and usb-msd to prevent conflict List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Roy Tam Cc: qemu-devel Hi, >> lsusb says: Bus 004 Device 002: ID 0409:55aa NEC Corp. Hub >> >> Looks sensible. Is that actually a USB 1.1 Hub? >> > > Yes. If you want a USB 2.0 ID, use 0x03f0:0x2002 (HP Hub) instead. > Using USB 1.1 ID to prevent "High Speed" information cloud in XP. No, a USB 1.1 Hub ID is perfectly fine as we are actually emulating a 1.1 Hub. Just asking because it wasn't obvious whenever this is a 1.1 or 2.0 hub id. > 0x46f4 is CRC16() of "QEMU". Ok. I'll add that as comment to the patch. thanks, Gerd