From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:32852) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R4YTN-0007J5-Nb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:28:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R4YTJ-0008EI-PS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:28:53 -0400 Message-ID: <4E734F03.5040300@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:28:35 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1315989802-18753-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <1315989802-18753-2-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <20110915031437.GR9025@yookeroo.fritz.box> <4E71A2D2.2080008@redhat.com> <20110916030616.GZ9025@yookeroo.fritz.box> <4E7327E4.7040708@redhat.com> <20110916152731.27f76f7d@BR8GGW75.de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20110916152731.27f76f7d@BR8GGW75.de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 01/58] spapr: proper qdevification List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth Cc: David Gibson , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf , qemu-devel Developers On 09/16/2011 03:27 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > So I suggest that I change SLOF to also use the "Logical unit > addressing method" like Linux does, which should result in the fact that > SLOF tries to scan the target IDs instead of the channels/bus IDs. > > What do you think, does that sound ok? Yes, that's perfect. Paolo