From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: krkumar2@in.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, joe@perches.com,
shemminger@vyatta.com, mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 0/5] Multiqueue support in tun/tap
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:44:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E770EF5.90705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110917191709.GA6127@redhat.com>
On 09/18/2011 03:17 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 02:02:04PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> A wiki-page was created to narrate the detail design of all parts
>> involved in the multi queue implementation:
>> http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Multiqueue and some basic tests result
>> could be seen in this page
>> http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Multiqueue-performance-Sep-13. I would
>> post the detail numbers in attachment as the reply of this thread.
> Does it make sense to test both with and without RPS in guest?
>
I've tested with RPS in guest, but didn't see improvements.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-19 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-17 6:02 [Qemu-devel] [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 0/5] Multiqueue support in tun/tap Jason Wang
2011-09-17 6:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 1/5] tuntap: move socket to tun_file Jason Wang
2011-09-17 6:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 2/5] tuntap: categorize ioctl Jason Wang
2011-09-17 6:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 3/5] tuntap: introduce multiqueue flags Jason Wang
2011-09-17 6:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 4/5] tuntap: multiqueue support Jason Wang
2011-09-17 6:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 5/5] tuntap: add ioctls to attach or detach a file form tap device Jason Wang
2011-09-17 19:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 0/5] Multiqueue support in tun/tap Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-09-19 9:44 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2011-09-19 14:45 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E770EF5.90705@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).