From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:32969)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jasowang@redhat.com>) id 1R5aM3-0001Uy-Ij
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 05:41:39 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jasowang@redhat.com>) id 1R5aM2-0004lP-7v
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 05:41:35 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:63262)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jasowang@redhat.com>) id 1R5aM2-0004lK-0o
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 05:41:34 -0400
Message-ID: <4E770EF5.90705@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:44:21 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20110917055639.32666.89940.stgit@dhcp-91-7.nay.redhat.com.englab.nay.redhat.com>
	<20110917191709.GA6127@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110917191709.GA6127@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 0/5] Multiqueue support in
	tun/tap
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: krkumar2@in.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, joe@perches.com, shemminger@vyatta.com, mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl, davem@davemloft.net

On 09/18/2011 03:17 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 02:02:04PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> A wiki-page was created to narrate the detail design of all parts
>> involved in the multi queue implementation:
>> http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Multiqueue and some basic tests result
>> could be seen in this page
>> http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Multiqueue-performance-Sep-13. I would
>> post the detail numbers in attachment as the reply of this thread.
> Does it make sense to test both with and without RPS in guest?
>
I've tested with RPS in guest, but didn't see improvements.