From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] memory: Fix old portio word accesses
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:09:24 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E773F04.9000102@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E773BD5.8020105@web.de>
On 09/19/2011 03:55 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> > The trick of having a way to register N callbacks with one shot is worth
> > growing. Ideally each register in a BAR would have a callback and we'd
> > do something like
> >
> > MemoryRegionOps mydev_ops = {
> > .registers = {
> > { MYDEV_REG_x, 4, 4, mydev_reg_x_read, mydev_reg_x_write, },
> > ...
> > },
> > }
> >
> > with hints to the core like "this register sits at this offset, use it
> > for reads instead of a callback", or, "this is a read-only register".
>
> This has pros and cons. If you have n registers to dispatch, you then
> have to write n function prologues and maybe epilogues instead of just
> one. Specifically if the register access is trivial, that could case
> quite some LoC blowup on the device side.
>
> What may have a better ratio are generic register get/set handlers.
>
With C++ pointers-to-members and pointers-to-member-functions, you
actually get some nice representation:
class MyDev {
void reg_1_read(...) { return some_computation(); }
void reg_1_write(...) { do_something(); }
uint32_t reg_2;
void reg_2_write(...) { reg_2 = value; do_something(); }
uint64_t reg_3;
static const Register registers[] = {
Register(REG_1, &MyDev::reg_1_read, &MyDev::reg_1_write),
Register(REG_2, &MyDev::reg_2, &MyDev::reg_2_write),
Register(REG_1, &MyDev::reg_3),
};
};
... and the Register class generates the appropriate accessors. We can
emulate some of this with macros, but the conversion from opaque to the
actual type will always be ugly.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-19 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-18 12:44 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] memory: Fix old portio word accesses Jan Kiszka
2011-09-18 12:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 " Jan Kiszka
2011-09-18 15:37 ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-18 15:43 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-18 15:45 ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-18 16:28 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-18 16:49 ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-18 19:07 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-19 12:19 ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-19 12:32 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-19 12:42 ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-19 12:55 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-19 13:09 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-09-19 13:55 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-09-19 13:58 ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-26 13:30 ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-18 14:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH " Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E773F04.9000102@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).