From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43204) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R88vF-0003tQ-P7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 07:00:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R88vE-0002u3-SS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 07:00:29 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:56346) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R88vE-0002tw-NP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 07:00:28 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R88v6-0001Pm-2w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:00:20 +0200 Received: from 93-34-218-143.ip51.fastwebnet.it ([93.34.218.143]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:00:20 +0200 Received: from pbonzini by 93-34-218-143.ip51.fastwebnet.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:00:20 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:00:08 +0200 Message-ID: <4E805B38.2020301@redhat.com> References: <4E802979.9060707@siemens.com> <4E802EB5.3000800@redhat.com> <4E804496.6040305@siemens.com> <4E804AB0.9040307@redhat.com> <4E805360.20609@siemens.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <4E805360.20609@siemens.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] scsi: lsi problems since "unit attention on reset" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 09/26/2011 12:26 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> scsi_req_parsed target 0 lun 0 tag 0 command 0 dir 0 length 0 >>> scsi_req_parsed_lba target 0 lun 0 tag 0 command 0 lba 0 >>> scsi_req_alloc target 0 lun 0 tag 0 >>> scsi_test_unit_ready target 0 lun 0 tag 0 >>> scsi_req_build_sense target 0 lun 0 tag 0 key 0x6 asc 0x29 ascq 00 >>> scsi_req_dequeue target 0 lun 0 tag 0 >> >> This looks good. > > Nope, no effect. How does the trace go on? Paolo