From: Harsh Bora <harsh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] VirtIO 9p mount_tag (bogus?) limit of 32 bytes
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:22:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E830A66.50605@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110922174233.GD31504@redhat.com>
On 09/22/2011 11:12 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> I've noticed that if you use a virtio 9p filesystem with a mount_tag
> property value that is longer than 32 bytes, it gets silently truncated.
>
> In virtio-9p-device.c
>
> len = strlen(conf->tag);
> if (len> MAX_TAG_LEN) {
> len = MAX_TAG_LEN;
I think its better to return here with a failure message saying
mount_tag too long. IIUC, The 32 byte limit has been kept because of
understanding that mount_tag is a device name in guest (and not a path
location).
Aneesh, any inputs ?
- Harsh
> }
>
>
> The header virtio-9p.h contains
>
>
> /* from Linux's linux/virtio_9p.h */
>
> /* The ID for virtio console */
> #define VIRTIO_ID_9P 9
> #define MAX_REQ 128
> #define MAX_TAG_LEN 32
>
>
> The Linux kernel's virtio_9p.h, however, does not have any MAX_TAG_LEN
> constant and AFAICT the code in Linux's net/9p/trans_virtio.c is not
> placing any 32 byte length restriction on the mount tag.
>
> So is this QEMU length limit legacy code that can be removed ?
>
> If using the mount_tag to specify the desired guest mount location path,
> then 32 bytes is really quite limiting - a good 255 bytes is much more
> desirable.
>
> Finally, regardless of what limit is imposed, it would be better to
> return an error if the user attempts to specify an excessively long
> mount tag, rather than truncate it breaking the guest app relying on
> the full tag.
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-28 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-22 17:42 [Qemu-devel] VirtIO 9p mount_tag (bogus?) limit of 32 bytes Daniel P. Berrange
2011-09-28 11:52 ` Harsh Bora [this message]
2011-09-28 15:18 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-09-29 15:22 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-09-29 15:45 ` Daniel P. Berrange
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-16 12:20 C Anthony Risinger
2012-02-16 20:54 ` Paul Brook
2012-02-18 17:38 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-02-22 3:58 ` C Anthony Risinger
2012-02-23 18:08 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2012-03-07 16:29 ` M. Mohan Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E830A66.50605@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=harsh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).