From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60162)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1R9JD9-0007Hn-OH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:11:51 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1R9JD8-0002jq-Ux
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:11:47 -0400
Received: from mail-wy0-f173.google.com ([74.125.82.173]:37883)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1R9JD8-0002jd-NY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:11:46 -0400
Received: by wyh22 with SMTP id 22so180596wyh.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:11:46 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Richard Henderson <rth7680@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4E8498BD.10800@twiddle.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:11:41 -0700
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4E8312D7.4080403@siemens.com> <4E832E88.6080909@twiddle.net>
	<4E83304F.4010008@siemens.com> <4E833AEA.8080508@twiddle.net>
	<4E839A88.4060003@web.de> <4E83A3F7.3000508@twiddle.net>
	<4E84570F.3040103@siemens.com> <4E848785.6090604@twiddle.net>
	<4E848C8D.7030209@siemens.com> <4E848D7F.3090302@siemens.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E848D7F.3090302@siemens.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] tcg-i386: Introduce limited deposit
	support
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>

On 09/29/2011 08:23 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> +#ifndef TCG_TARGET_deposit_i32_valid
> +#define TCG_TARGET_deposit_i32_valid(ofs, len) 0
> +#endif
> +#ifndef TCG_TARGET_deposit_i64_valid
> +#define TCG_TARGET_deposit_i64_valid(ofs, len) 0
> +#endif

Err, no.  The default is true.  The targets that currently
implement deposit at present can handle arbitrary inputs.


r~