From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60124) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9LDM-000547-Ay for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:20:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9LDK-0007D8-Vp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:20:08 -0400 Received: from thoth.sbs.de ([192.35.17.2]:30675) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R9LDK-0007B0-JY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 14:20:06 -0400 Message-ID: <4E84B6BE.4080806@siemens.com> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:19:42 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1ab74cea060d776b19857c3babc64d729bbdba5c.1312370658.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com> <20110929160646.GA16909@amit-x200.redhat.com> <4E84ADCD.8030005@siemens.com> <20110929175037.GA21901@amit-x200.redhat.com> <4E84B0AB.1060303@siemens.com> <20110929180540.GB21901@amit-x200.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20110929180540.GB21901@amit-x200.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Delayed IP packets List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Amit Shah Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel , Fabien Chouteau On 2011-09-29 20:05, Amit Shah wrote: > On (Thu) 29 Sep 2011 [19:53:47], Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> Can't reproduce, I'm not getting stable hibernation here even without >>>> any network configured. >>> >>> With virtio devices and the patches applied? Can you tell me what >>> you're seeing? >> >> No, I didn't patch my guest. I was using standard IDE with an emulated >> NIC (or without) against a 3.1-rc3 (or so) guest. > > Strange, using qemu.git and an F14 guest (2.6.38) using this cmd line: > > ./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -m 512 /guests/f14-suspend.qcow2 -net none -enable-kvm -smp 2 > > I could successfully hibernate and resume. -cpu qemu64,-kvmclock makes it work. Would have to check a different kernel version to find out if it's a guest kernel or qemu/kvm issue. > >>>> Could you check if the recent pull request [1] changes the picture for you? >>> >>> Thanks, that series fixes the problem. >> >> Perfect! Right in time. :) > > And people say slirp is neglected and unmaintainable :-) Who says this? I think slirp just needed some attention. It already presented two fairly old bugs to me, but strangely right after I adopted it... ;) Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux