From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] i386: wire up MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 19:24:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E8B416A.2090401@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E8B4087.4060906@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2158 bytes --]
On 2011-10-04 19:21, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 10/04/2011 07:14 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> >
>> >> > +
>> >> > +static const VMStateDescription vmstate_msr_ia32_misc_enable = {
>> >> > + .name = "cpu/msr_ia32_misc_enable",
>> >> > + .version_id = 1,
>> >> > + .minimum_version_id = 1,
>> >> > + .minimum_version_id_old = 1,
>> >> > + .fields = (VMStateField []) {
>> >> > + VMSTATE_UINT64(msr_ia32_misc_enable, CPUState),
>> >> > + VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
>> >> > + }
>> >> > +};
>> >> > +
>> >>
>> >> We are about to bump the CPU_SAVE_VERSION for the sake of APIC
>> deadline
>> >> timer, so you can jump on that train and avoid this subsection.
>> >
>> > Must we do that? Considering that no guest will use the deadline
>> timer,
>> > it seems to be an excellent candidates for subsections.
>>
>> I don't know, it was sent out for pull like that. And I thought
>> subsections are still broken, aren't they?
>
> Well let's fix subsections instead of disabling migration to older
> versions.
>
>> >>
>> >> This MSR is Intel-specific, isn't it? Then I guess it should be
>> limited
>> >> to Intel CPU types.
>> >
>> > It's an "architectural MSR" that is only available on some Intel
>> > models. Either we do a full cpuid qualification of accessible MSRs
>> (and
>> > bits within MSRs), or not. Qualifying just by vendor ID is pointless.
>>
>> Given that, when in conflict, we rather model after AMD than Intel for
>> TCG, I would hesitate to expose this by default. Or are there
>> precedences already?
>
> Practically all MSRs. i486 doesn't have any, IIRC, for example.
Pre-Pentiums don't have instructions to access them as well, so that
doesn't cause any harm.
>
> (and given this MSR has no effect, the only difference it makes to
> guests is the #GP we take or not; still it may be worthwhile to
> construct some table-driven thing to allow or reject MSR accesses, both
> for kvm and qemu)
Right. If this MSR is not the first bogus one on AMD, we can do this
later. If it is, it should be done first.
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-04 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-04 14:26 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] i386: wire up MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE Avi Kivity
2011-10-04 16:05 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-10-04 17:08 ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-04 17:14 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-10-04 17:21 ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-04 17:24 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2011-10-04 17:51 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E8B416A.2090401@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).