qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] runstate: do not discard runstate changes when paused
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 19:23:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E8C9289.1080408@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111005140222.11294000@doriath>

On 10/05/2011 07:02 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:37:51 +0200
> Avi Kivity<avi@redhat.com>  wrote:
>
> >  On 10/05/2011 06:31 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >  >  >>
> >  >  >
> >  >  >   vm_start() should be symmetric with vm_stop().  That is, if a piece of
> >  >  >   code wants to execute with vcpus stopped, it should just run inside a
> >  >  >   stop/start pair.
> >  >  >
> >  >  >   The only confusion can come from the user, if he sees multiple stop
> >  >  >   events and expects that just one cont will continue the vm.  For the
> >  >  >   machine monitor, we should just document that the you have to issue one
> >  >  >   cont for every stop event you see (plus any stops you issue).  It's not
> >  >  >   unnatural - the code that handles a stop_due_to_enospace can work to fix
> >  >  >   the error and issue a cont, disregarding any other stops in progress
> >  >  >   (due to a user pressing the stop button, or migration, or cpu hotplug,
> >  >  >   or whatever).  For the human monitor, it's not so intuitive, but the
> >  >  >   situation is so rare we can just rely on the user to issue cont again.
> >  >
> >  >  Making this kind of user-visible change would be a bad idea.
> >
> >  The current situation is a bad idea.
>
> Let's take the migration use-case as an example (ie. the user stops the VM
> before performing the migration). Today, if migration fails,
> migrate_fd_put_ready() will call vm_start() which will put the VM to
> run again.
>
> But if we implement the ref count idea, then vm_start() will just "unlock"
> migrate_fd_put_ready()'s own call to vm_stop(), that's, the user stop will
> remain and the user is required to do a 'cont'.
>
> I'd probably agree that that's the ideal semantics, but chances are we're
> going to break qmp clients here.

There are two questions here.  Is this autostart desirable?  (IMO no, 
but haven't given it much thought). If yes, we should provide it 
somehow.  If not, we should default to providing it, but switch to 
non-autostart if a newer client indicates it understands the new semantics.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-05 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-04 12:04 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] runstate: do not discard runstate changes when paused Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-04 13:49 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-10-04 14:09   ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-04 14:30     ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-10-05 14:37 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-10-05 15:43   ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-05 15:44     ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-05 16:31     ` Jan Kiszka
2011-10-05 16:37       ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-05 16:49         ` Jan Kiszka
2011-10-05 17:12           ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-05 18:02             ` Jan Kiszka
2011-10-06 14:27               ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-06 15:08                 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-10-05 17:02         ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-10-05 17:23           ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-10-05 17:39             ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-10-05 18:02               ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-05 18:49                 ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-10-05 18:50                   ` Luiz Capitulino
2011-10-06 11:14                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-10 18:49 ` Luiz Capitulino

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E8C9289.1080408@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).