From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59323) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RCqaW-0004Y4-6j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2011 06:26:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RCqaU-000490-Ss for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2011 06:26:32 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de ([217.72.192.227]:59888) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RCqaU-00048c-Hw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2011 06:26:30 -0400 Message-ID: <4E9176BE.3090106@web.de> Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 12:26:06 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4E8ECA91.8040409@cn.fujitsu.com> <4E8ED167.1000705@siemens.com> <20111008151622.GA17181@amd.home.annexia.org> <4E916035.5050906@web.de> <20111009102338.GN16799@amd.home.annexia.org> In-Reply-To: <20111009102338.GN16799@amd.home.annexia.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB26C581CFBFF9BD0C1436287" Sender: jan.kiszka@web.de Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Question] dump memory when host pci device is used by guest List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Richard W.M. Jones" Cc: qemu-devel , Luiz Capitulino This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB26C581CFBFF9BD0C1436287 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2011-10-09 12:23, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 10:49:57AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> As explained in the other replies: It is way more future-proof to use = an >> interface for this which was designed for it (remote gdb) instead of >> artificially relaxing reasonable constraints of the migration mechanis= m >> plus having to follow that format with the post-processing tool. >=20 > Any interface that isn't "get this information off my production > server *now*" so that I can get the server restarted, and send it to > an expert to analyse -- is a poor interface, whether it was designed > like that or not. Perhaps we don't have the right interface at all, > but remote gdb is not it. Why is it not (for implementing core file write-out - I'm not proposing to drop that part of libvirt)? Jan --------------enigB26C581CFBFF9BD0C1436287 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6RdsEACgkQitSsb3rl5xSwiwCeNUVrdpPN/7AOxYQeDxKlUkEA fxUAn3TvGzw3oFkob6U5vZ9pFoo8hLCc =9tKc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB26C581CFBFF9BD0C1436287--