From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56350)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1RDHic-0007sv-5T
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:24:43 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1RDHia-0008Nh-Kg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:24:42 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:25151)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1RDHia-0008NP-8a
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:24:40 -0400
Message-ID: <4E930E33.7090606@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:24:35 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1317675329.git.mtosatti@redhat.com>	<4E930409.6060000@us.ibm.com>	<4E9305BD.70809@redhat.com>
	<4E930774.90806@us.ibm.com> <4E93089B.1080008@redhat.com>
	<4E930B55.70206@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <4E930B55.70206@codemonkey.ws>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/1] [PULL] qemu-kvm.git uq/master queue
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org

On 10/10/2011 05:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 10/10/2011 10:00 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 10/10/2011 04:55 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
>>> Hrm, sorry about that. In the future, it would be helpful to explicitly
>>> withdrawal a PULL request.
>>>
>>> Do you want me to revert?
>>
>> We'll send the revert together with the new patch.
>>
>>> FWIW, I think bumping the version is the right thing to do.
>>
>> Why?
>
> Because we still haven't fixed subsections.  Juan's patches help but 
> they can still result in sending bad data to and older QEMU that won't 
> handle it properly.
>
> We need to figure out a proper fix for subsections, either Paolo's 
> protocol change or moving subsections out to a detected section.

Ok.  So bumping the version is only right if we don't fix subsections.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function