qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] block: unify flush implementations
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:47:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E983D7A.6020208@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111014132002.GA1486@stefanha-thinkpad.localdomain>

On 10/14/2011 03:20 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> It's just too tempting to call these functions in contexts where it is
> not okay to do so.  The bdrv_co_*() functions are all tagged as
> coroutine_fn and make it clear that they can yield.

Yes, I agree.

> We already have an event loop in qemu-img except it's the nested event
> loop in synchronous bdrv_*() emulation functions.  The nested event loop
> is a mini event loop and can't really do things like timers.  It would
> be nicer to remove it in favor of a single top-level event loop with the
> qemu-img code running in a coroutine.

Note that the nested event loop cannot go away because of 
qemu_aio_flush, though. :(

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-14 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-14  8:41 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] coroutinization of flush and discard (split out of NBD series) Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-14  8:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] block: rename bdrv_co_rw_bh Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-14  8:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] block: unify flush implementations Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-14 11:08   ` Kevin Wolf
2011-10-14 11:30     ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-14 11:54       ` Kevin Wolf
2011-10-14 12:42         ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-14 14:02           ` Kevin Wolf
2011-10-14 14:04             ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-14 13:20         ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-10-14 13:47           ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2011-10-14  8:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] block: drop redundant bdrv_flush implementation Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-14  8:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] block: add bdrv_co_discard and bdrv_aio_discard support Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-14 14:23   ` Kevin Wolf
2011-10-14 14:24     ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-10-14 14:32       ` Kevin Wolf
2011-10-14 14:35         ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E983D7A.6020208@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).