From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52687)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1RFN1T-0000dg-Rm
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 05:28:48 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1RFN1S-00073T-SF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 05:28:47 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36164)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <avi@redhat.com>) id 1RFN1S-00073H-Jy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 05:28:46 -0400
Message-ID: <4E9AA3C5.5040608@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:28:37 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20110913093835.GB4265@localhost.localdomain>	<20110914093441.e2bb305c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>	<4E705BC3.5000508@cn.fujitsu.com>	<20110915164704.9cacd407.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>	<4E71B28F.7030201@cn.fujitsu.com>	<4E72F3BA.2000603@jp.fujitsu.com>	<4E73200A.7040908@jp.fujitsu.com>	<4E76C6AA.9080403@cn.fujitsu.com>	<4E7B04DC.1030407@cn.fujitsu.com>	<4E7B4B8F.507@siemens.com>
	<4E7C51E4.2000503@cn.fujitsu.com>	<4E7F3585.40108@redhat.com>
	<4E7F635E.6080009@web.de> <4E8035F9.9080908@redhat.com>
	<4E928B4E.2080207@cn.fujitsu.com> <4E92C86D.9000701@redhat.com>
	<4E947628.6020105@cn.fujitsu.com> <4E94858C.7060307@web.de>
	<4E978857.1080106@cn.fujitsu.com> <4E9A9BB5.60008@redhat.com>
	<4E9A9E4F.6070305@web.de>
In-Reply-To: <4E9A9E4F.6070305@web.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1 V3] kernel/kvm: fix improper nmi
	emulation
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>, Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>

On 10/16/2011 11:05 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> + KVM_CAP_LAPIC_NMI
> + documentation of KVM_CAP_LAPIC_NMI vs. !KVM_CAP_LAPIC_NMI
>
> So you prefer this approach over V5 / KVM_SET_LINT1? Just to make sure
> we are all looking at the full picture.

Sorry, I haven't read v5 yet (I think it wasn't downloaded at the time)
- will look at it now.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function