From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59274) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFqPV-0005ey-NT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:51:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFqPU-0000fx-AV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:51:33 -0400 Received: from mail-vx0-f173.google.com ([209.85.220.173]:62205) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFqPU-0000fs-71 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:51:32 -0400 Received: by vcbfl17 with SMTP id fl17so3131591vcb.4 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:51:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E9C5D10.6020908@codemonkey.ws> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:51:28 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1318213565-3268-1-git-send-email-jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> <1318213565-3268-7-git-send-email-jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> <4E9C0746.3030509@suse.de> <4E9C07D1.9090004@redhat.com> <4E9C0C6F.6070502@suse.de> <4E9C5A33.2060003@suse.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] GPLv3 troubles List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 10/17/2011 11:47 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 17 October 2011 17:39, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Am 17.10.2011 13:10, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: >>> Making a list of GPLv2 files would be a start, though. >> >> grep -r version *.c comes up with these: > > Your rune needs tweaking -- it isn't looking inside any > subdirectories. Including binutils code is just a bad idea. I know noone wants to hear that but it's unfortunately true. The FSF does copyright assignment which means it's easy for them to relicense. Since we don't do copyright assignment, it's much, much harder for us to relicense. We'd waste huge amounts of man hours trying to chase binutils license. We need to stick with the v2 version of binutils and perhaps work toward an alternative in the future. Relicensing is just not practical. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > -- PMM >