From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@siriusit.co.uk>,
Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com>, Bob Breuer <breuerr@mc.net>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:11:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E9C8C07.6070706@twiddle.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAu8pHv2gG6o0k-MbDxtOPTiL8k9s_RgSp2w0O2ZkQM+RWN1rw@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/17/2011 12:14 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> IIRC buggy versions of alloca() could also fail without a frame pointer.
(1) GCC always uses a frame pointer for alloca,
(2) Unless you do -fno-builtin-alloca, we always implement it inline.
r~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-17 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-17 4:39 [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-sparc io-thread segfault on win32 Bob Breuer
[not found] ` <4E9C0497.2000605@siriusit.co.uk>
2011-10-17 14:09 ` Bob Breuer
2011-10-17 17:22 ` [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp Richard Henderson
2011-10-17 19:14 ` Blue Swirl
2011-10-17 20:11 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2011-10-17 21:20 ` Bob Breuer
2011-10-17 21:31 ` Kai Tietz
2011-10-17 22:23 ` Bob Breuer
2011-10-17 22:56 ` Kai Tietz
2011-10-19 21:05 ` Bob Breuer
2011-10-19 22:19 ` Richard Henderson
2011-10-20 4:22 ` xunxun
2011-10-20 14:48 ` Kai Tietz
2011-10-20 15:34 ` Kai Tietz
[not found] ` <j7sgfi$i66$1@dough.gmane.org>
2011-10-22 5:13 ` xunxun
2011-10-22 5:21 ` xunxun
2011-10-22 11:19 ` Kai Tietz
2011-10-22 14:23 ` asmwarrior
2011-10-24 14:45 ` Bob Breuer
2011-10-24 16:18 ` Kai Tietz
2011-10-25 15:14 ` Bob Breuer
2011-10-20 13:04 ` jojelino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E9C8C07.6070706@twiddle.net \
--to=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=breuerr@mc.net \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=ktietz70@googlemail.com \
--cc=mark.cave-ayland@siriusit.co.uk \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).