From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55891) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGAmb-0005gi-Kt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:36:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGAmV-0002oA-UI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:36:45 -0400 Received: from mail-iy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.210.173]:46539) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGAmV-0002nv-RC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:36:39 -0400 Received: by iakl21 with SMTP id l21so905056iak.4 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 07:36:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E9D8EF0.503@codemonkey.ws> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:36:32 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1318213565-3268-1-git-send-email-jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> <1318213565-3268-7-git-send-email-jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> <4E9C0746.3030509@suse.de> <4E9C21C0.5070102@us.ibm.com> <4E9C249D.3080509@redhat.com> <4E9C38F5.2060803@codemonkey.ws> <4E9C5832.908@suse.de> <4E9C5C3E.8030505@codemonkey.ws> <4E9C69E3.6080501@weilnetz.de> <4E9C93C5.9070101@redhat.com> <4E9D7918.7060103@codemonkey.ws> <4E9D8E39.5070306@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <4E9D8E39.5070306@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] GPLv3 troubles List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Cc: Stefan Weil , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster , Blue Swirl , Max Filippov , Avi Kivity , Paolo Bonzini On 10/18/2011 09:33 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 18.10.2011 15:03, schrieb Anthony Liguori: >> Okay, let's get serious about it. I set up the following wiki page for >> coordination: >> >> http://wiki.qemu.org/Relicensing >> >> Please get the appropriate approval at Red Hat, and follow the >> instructions on the wiki. I'm in the process of getting approval at >> IBM. Between RH, IBM, and Blue, there's a pretty large chunk of files >> that can be relicensed immediately. It's probably best to tackle this >> incrementally. > > Sounds like a plan, thanks. > > The file list still has some false positives. Might edit later. > In block/ I noticed sheepdog.c and rbd.c that are GPLv2, too. Yes, please edit the wiki. I just attempted to post a strawman to get us started. > A few files are completely lacking a license btw. Yes, we'll have to list those separately, contact the original author to add a copyright statement+license, and get every contributor to SoB the change. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Andreas >