From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, joerg.roedel@amd.com, rth@twiddle.net,
agraf@suse.de, eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro, kraxel@redhat.com,
Paul 'Rusty' Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/9] Add stub functions for PCI device models to do PCI DMA
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:10:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E9E93F7.8080400@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111018014650.GB6655@truffala.fritz.box>
On 10/18/2011 03:46 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 03:15:53PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 10/14/2011 04:14 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > > > Virtio is a very, very special case. virtio requires coherent RAM access.
> > >
> > > Right. Virtio's access to memory is *not* emulated PCI DMA, it's
> > > god-like hypervisor access to guest system memory. It should
> > > correctly bypass any IOMMU, and so should remain as
> > > cpu_physical_memory_rw() or the atomic accessors, rather than being
> > > converted to this new API.
> >
> > virtio should definitely not bypass an iommu.
>
> So, I just had a chat with Rusty about this. Perhaps it shouldn't,
> but it does. The spec is in terms of guest physical addresses, not
> bus/DMA addresses, and more to the point the Linux driver does *not*
> do the necessary dma_map() and unmap operations to treat this as a PCI
> DMA. So like it or not, god-like hypervisor access rather than
> emulated PCI DMA is what it does.
Wow, how did we manage to break virtio in so many different ways?
Is there a way to unbreak it? On x86 it will continue to work if we
rewrite the spec in terms of pci dma, what about non-x86?
>
> > A guest may assign a
> > virtio device to nested guests, and would wish it confined by the
> > emulated iommu.
>
> Well, that would be nice, but it can't be done. It could be fixed,
> but it would be an incompatible change so it would need a new feature
> bit corresponding changes in the Linux driver to do the dma map/unmap
> if it accepts the "respect IOMMU" feature.
Needs to be done IMO.
>
> > More generally, a guest sees a virtio device as just another pci device,
> > and has no way to tell that it bypasses the iommu.
>
> Well, except the fact that the driver knows its a virtio device,
> because it's a virtio driver. It's not like you can write a driver
> that uses PCI DMA without knowing the particulars of the device you're
> using.
virtio-pci knows it's pci, there's no excuse.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-19 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-05 4:34 [Qemu-devel] [0/9] Preliminary work for IOMMU emulation support; the easy bits (v2) David Gibson
2011-09-05 4:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/9] Add stub functions for PCI device models to do PCI DMA David Gibson
2011-10-02 10:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-10-02 10:29 ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-02 10:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-10-02 10:58 ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-02 11:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-10-02 11:28 ` Alexander Graf
2011-10-02 11:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-10-02 12:01 ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-02 12:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-10-02 12:26 ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-03 13:17 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-10-12 3:09 ` David Gibson
2011-10-12 9:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-10-14 2:14 ` David Gibson
2011-10-16 12:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-10-16 13:15 ` Avi Kivity
2011-10-18 1:46 ` David Gibson
2011-10-19 0:31 ` Rusty Russell
2011-10-19 1:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-10-19 9:10 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-10-20 2:58 ` David Gibson
2011-10-12 3:07 ` David Gibson
2011-10-12 7:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-10-12 15:43 ` David Gibson
2011-10-12 15:45 ` David Gibson
2011-10-12 3:11 ` David Gibson
2011-10-12 8:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-10-12 9:08 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2011-10-03 13:10 ` Anthony Liguori
2011-09-05 4:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/9] rtl8139: Use PCI DMA stub functions David Gibson
2011-09-05 4:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] eepro100: " David Gibson
2011-10-02 11:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-10-14 2:15 ` David Gibson
2011-09-05 4:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/9] ac97: " David Gibson
2011-09-05 4:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/9] es1370: " David Gibson
2011-09-05 4:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/9] e1000: " David Gibson
2011-09-05 4:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/9] lsi53c895a: " David Gibson
2011-09-05 4:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] pcnet-pci: " David Gibson
2011-09-05 4:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 9/9] intel-hda: " David Gibson
2011-09-16 6:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [0/9] Preliminary work for IOMMU emulation support; the easy bits (v2) David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E9E93F7.8080400@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro \
--cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).