From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49749) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGSTN-0001nh-Ps for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 05:30:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGSTH-0000s8-IW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 05:30:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46928) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGSTH-0000s1-9j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 05:29:59 -0400 Message-ID: <4E9E988D.9080701@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:29:49 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20110913093835.GB4265@localhost.localdomain> <20110914093441.e2bb305c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <4E705BC3.5000508@cn.fujitsu.com> <20110915164704.9cacd407.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <4E71B28F.7030201@cn.fujitsu.com> <4E72F3BA.2000603@jp.fujitsu.com> <4E73200A.7040908@jp.fujitsu.com> <4E76C6AA.9080403@cn.fujitsu.com> <4E7B04DC.1030407@cn.fujitsu.com> <4E7B4B8F.507@siemens.com> <4E7C51E4.2000503@cn.fujitsu.com> <4E7F3585.40108@redhat.com> <4E7F635E.6080009@web.de> <4E8035F9.9080908@redhat.com> <4E928B54.1070707@cn.fujitsu.com> <4E92958E.9000509@web.de> <4E9476E2.1070804@cn.fujitsu.com> <4E948842.4030406@web.de> <4E978827.6070008@cn.fujitsu.com> <4E97CE42.9020102@web.de> <4E97D85C.7070107@cn.fujitsu.com> <4E97DB62.9020605@web.de> <4E97FAC7.6080007@cn.fujitsu.com> <4E9AA657.1050503@redhat.com> <4E9BF821.2070805@cn.fujitsu.com> <4E9BFA40.5070806@redhat.com> <4E9C5106.5070506@cn.fujitsu.com> <4E9DD659.1050005@web.de> In-Reply-To: <4E9DD659.1050005@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1 V6] qemu-kvm: fix improper nmi emulation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , Lai Jiangshan , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Kenji Kaneshige -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/18/2011 09:41 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > Looks OK to me. > > Same here. - -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOnpiNAAoJEI7yEDeUysxllqUP/3K9oPbz9OxbqH3+9G1W9cUy 49hKR0DtLyf5WH0hoSq3/jA2T00PWR6fLIo6itth76x/TqnIuimjln6Nrj/T2nhO PPvwJB4OE/9ahSlm3JOVsE/JYwDx6h3u9eouN5BqVoQax8S3mnhxSGLxZOp8wvar ol6vDj2U8JbigV3fCsFheiP9tTZWZgH66qCdCUzuNUnYWUW5m9repdsXflTp6YyW id30xzuZETnQ/0RFU0hnhrfQ/vvm1dJeK6Y2bPKowoDCp+CFNi/CnJYDAZA18FSQ V5096U8cj8/m/Hr8fPLpyZzDonPz0KfMPvtfV9rVHEtqvf04Ym+gcdfwo+2U4LQs 16RNGWwsF6qIAcyevK9xCpcU9g00v6m0fyj3eQgD+JT+pV+m8QCzNnQyDqDlEUEl ub0WR7ilnl3/NIa6FTKHqZ5Wct8f9mO6wcCtJKXDTcHo/2uB5+kHzqJsLE2UCaXm ptaiyFGZgGNpUocO+tYxeORWm4kNMoZRAaYmiU0RWaoIkQMY0P/m/Ghy+nZBUexM vdH1lQ8DQoqQQxiC38MoO717rBOHDgxPoUGVPyPtU7qPhI2sSMYa2r+Uwi/Pmsm/ /dbKMbQs9q9pVkESBsmpkSLMVOrLQE/ju3h7iikZmY5RVrm+pI8fyOo9e20+/mKG aO5IT5IDaHXAVk8jjAWB =rMf/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----